Lacan offers a bit of a
critique of the mirror stage -- not just exposition but objections. Some
ideas: this stage -- occurring between 6 to 18 months -- “places the primordial
I in a fictional direction.”
It’s a mirage, a gestalt,
a statue, a phantom, an automaton, an illusion, a projection.
A kind of fundamental
hallucination
He says that the mirror-I
is “more constituent than constituted” -- that is, this mere part takes the
place of the whole -- stands-in for it -- fixes it, inverts it, sets it up as a
basic opposition:
Same Turbulent
Thing Changing
Over Over
Here Here
Inaugurating the mental
phenomena of the I -- the subject enframed into the mirror I
Lacan regards the mirror
as a trap. It sells the obligation to
harden and become a ‘this.’
Fragment overwhelms whole
-- simple versus complex -- stagnant versus dynamism.
The thing that cannot
possibly be seen as self-contained and self-sufficient --
is shaped and projected into a thing that is seen as wholly self-contained and self-sufficient
Some of his enigmatic sayings -- themes for thought:
is shaped and projected into a thing that is seen as wholly self-contained and self-sufficient
Some of his enigmatic sayings -- themes for thought:
from this point on the I that thinks cannot be the I that is
Return to Hegel: the I can
only know itself in terms of an I that can recognize the I --
therefore self-consciousness can only fulfill itself in another self-consciousness --
therefore self-consciousness can only fulfill itself in another self-consciousness --
'Future anterior' (Jacques Lacan) = later idea of 'Anticipated belatedness' (Samuel Weber)
“I am launching myself into a field to find out what I might have become”
?
No comments:
Post a Comment